Cover Image

EVALUATION OF POSSIBLE FAILURE MECHANISMS OF SHORT SEGMENT FIXATION IN UNSTABLE BURST FRACTURES OF THORACOLUMBAR SPINE IN ANIMAL MODEL

AZAD SAIT S

Abstract


Background - Burst fractures are common cause of disability among the affected young population and            instrumented surgical stabilisation remains the treatment of choice for unstable burst fractures of the vertebra.                 Circumferential fixation and short segment posterior fixation with intermediate screws inserted into the fractured level are the commonly performed surgical stabilisation procedures. But, decreasing the instrumented level in order to preserve the number of motion levels may adversely affect the stability of the construct and can ultimately result in implant failure. Aim - To evaluate the possible mechanisms of failure of the short segment fixation methods in experimentally induced unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine in calf spine model. Materials and Methods - Eight fresh frozen calf spines specimens were prepared and grouped into two Group A and Group B. After creating an unstable burst fracture by drop weight method at the first lumbar vertebra level, Group A specimens were instrumented using short segment posterior fixation with screws inserted to the fractured level while the specimens in Group B were instrumented using    circumferential fixation. The specimens were then subjected to biomechanical testing in a universal testing device (Tinius, Oslon) for failure in axial load and axial rotation. Results - All four specimens in the circumferential fixation group (Group B) failed in axial torque by screw pull out. No failure was   observed during axial loading. None of the specimens in the Group A failed in either axial torque or loading. Conclusions - Our findings show that circumferential              stabilization constructs can fail in axial torque, and therefore may require additional protection in the form of bracing in the immediate postoperative period. The use of the intermediate screw technique may provide superior stability in axial torque that the circumferential technique.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Denis F. The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries. Spine. 1983 Dec;8(8):817–31.

Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S, Petsinis G, Koureas G, Iliopoulos P. Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for midlumbar (L2-L4) burst fractures. Spine. 2006 Apr 15;31(8):859–68.

Kraemer WJ, Schemitsch EH, Lever J, McBroom RJ, McKee MD, Waddell JP. Functional outcome of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10(8):541–4.

Wood K, Buttermann G, Butterman G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85-A(5):773–81.

Butt MF, Farooq M, Mir B, Dhar AS, Hussain A, Mumtaz M. Management of unstable thoracolumbar spinal injuries by posterior short segment spinal fixation. Int Orthop. 2007 Apr;31(2):259–64.

Panjabi MM, Oxland TR, Kifune M, Arand M, Wen L, Chen A. Validity of the three-column theory of thoracolumbar fractures. A biomechanic investigation. Spine. 1995 May 15;20(10):1122–7.

Kifune M, Panjabi MM, Arand M, Liu W. Fracture pattern and instability of thoracolumbar injuries. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 1995;4(2):98–103.

Dick W, Kluger P, Magerl F, Woersdörfer O, Zäch G. A new device for internal fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fractures: the “fixateur interne.”Paraplegia. 1985 Aug;23(4):225–32.

Afzal S, Akbar S, Dhar SA. Short segment pedicle screw instrumentation and augmentation vertebroplasty in lumbar burst fractures: an experience. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2008 Mar;17(3):336–41.

Eno J-JT, Chen JL, Mitsunaga MM. Short same-segment fixation of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Hawaii J Med Public Health J Asia Pac Med Public Health. 2012 Jan;71(1):19–22.

Gelb D, Ludwig S, Karp JE, Chung EH, Werner C, Kim T, et al. Successful treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with short-segment pedicle instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Jul; 23(5):293–301.

Fredrickson BE, Edwards WT, Rauschning W, Bayley JC, Yuan HA. Vertebral burst fractures: an experimental, morphologic, and radiographic study. Spine. 1992 Sep;17(9):1012–21.

Nagel DA, Koogle TA, Piziali RL, Perkash I. Stability of the upper lumbar spine following progressive disruptions and the application of individual internal and external fixation devices. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981 Jan;63(1):62–70.

McLain RF. The biomechanics of long versus short fixation for thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine. 2006 May 15; 31(11 Suppl):S70–79; discussion S104.

Limb D, Shaw DL, Dickson RA. Neurological injury in thoracolumbar burst fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Sep;77(5):774–7.

Braakman R, Fontijne WP, Zeegers R, Steenbeek JR, Tanghe HL. Neurological deficit in injuries of the thoracic and lumbar spine. A consecutive series of 70 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1991;111(1-2):11–7.

Boerger TO, Limb D, Dickson RA. Does “canal clearance” affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fractures? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Jul;82(5):629–35.

Patwardhan AG, Carandang G, Ghanayem AJ, Havey RM, Cunningham B, Voronov LI, et al. Compressive preload improves the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage constructs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Sep;85-A(9):1749–56.

Wang H, Li C, Liu T, Zhao WD, Zhou Y. Biomechanical efficacy of monoaxial or polyaxial pedicle screw and additional screw insertion at the level of fracture, in lumbar burst fracture: An experimental study. Indian J Orthop. 2012 Jul;46(4):395-401.

Anekstein Y, Brosh T, Mirovsky Y. Intermediate screws in short segment pedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar fractures: a biomechanical study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Feb;20(1):72-7.

Kettler A, Liakos L, Haegele B, Wilke HJ. Are the spines of calf, pig and sheep suitable models for pre-clinical implant tests? Eur Spine J. 2007 Dec;16(12):2186-92. Epub 2007 Aug 25.

Wilke HJ, Krischak ST, Wenger KH, Claes LE (1997) Loaddisplacement properties of the thoracolumbar calf spine: experimental results and comparison to known human data. Eur Spine J 6(2):129–137

Cotterill PC, Kostuik JP, D'Angelo G, Fernie GR, Maki BE. J Orthop Res. 1986;4(3):298-303. An anatomical comparison of the human and bovine thoracolumbar spine.

Wilke HJ, Krischak S, Claes L. Biomechanical comparison of calf and human spines. J Orthop Res Off Publ Orthop Res Soc. 1996 May;14(3):500–3.

Riley LH, Eck JC, Yoshida H, Koh YD, You JW, Lim TH. A biomechanical comparison of calf versus cadaver lumbar spine models. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29:E217–220.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University