Cover Image

Evaluation of Arch Widths among Adults with Class I spacing and Class I Crowding Malocclusion

Evan. A. Clement 1, Shahul Hameed Faize .

Abstract


Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference between adults with Class I spacing (CIS), Class I Crowding malocclusion (CIC). Materials and Methods:   Samples of   40 class I spacing (CIS) patient models   (20 male and 20   female), 40 Class I crowding (CIC) patient models (20 male and 20 female) were selected for the study. Alveolar width, Intercanine width and Intermolar width of  maxillary and    mandibular arches were evaluated. Results: The mean   intercanine, Intermolar and the alveolar width of both the maxilla and mandibular  dental arch of  patients with   spacing  were increased when compared to patients   with crowding. The mean comparision based on gender   revealed that among the male patients with crowding showed an  increased  intercanin, Intermolar and an increase   alveolar width when compared to female with crowding in both  maxillary and madibular arch. Among the individual with spacing female patients had an increased maxillary intermolar width and increased alveolar width of both maxillary and  mandibular dentition when compared to Male patients with spacing. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that patient models with Class I skeletal and dental Spacing showed an increase in the arch width when compared to Class I skeletal and dental Crowding patient models.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Moorees C.F.A, Reed R.B (1964), Correlation among crown diameters of human teeth. Arch. Oral Biol. 9,685-697.

Samir E. Bishara, Paymun Bayati and Jane R. Jakobsen Longi tudinal comparisons of dental arch changes in normal and untreated Class II, Division 1 subjects and th eir clinical implications, Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;110:483-9.

Byung-in Kim Mohamed Bayome, Yoonji Kim, Seung-HakBaek, Seong Ho Han, Seong-Hun Kim, and Yoon-Ah Kook: Comparison of overjet among 3 arch types in normal occlusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop2011; 139:e253-e260.

Hassanali J, Odhiambo JW. Analysis of dental casts of 6 8 and 12 year old Kenyan children. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:135 42.

Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Mandibular arch form: The relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:430 8.

Staley RN, Stuntz WR, Peterson LC. A comparison of arch widths in adults with normal occlusion and adults with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1985;88:163 9.

Huth J, Staley RN, Jacobs R, Bigelow H, Jakobsen J. Arch widths in Class II 2 adults compared to adults with Class II 1 and normal occlusion. Angle Orthod 2007;77:837 44.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

An Initiative of The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University