Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Post-ERCP: Impact on Surgical and Postoperative Outcome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65129/surgical.v1i1.15Keywords:
ERCP, Ideal Timing, Laparoscopic CholecystectomyAbstract
The standard management of Common Bile Duct (CBD) stones involves Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for stone clearance, followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC). However, the optimal timing of LC after ERCP remains debated, as inappropriate intervals can increase postoperative complications, such as inflammation, adhesions, and injury to adjacent structures, including the duodenum or biliary tract. This study aims to compare the technical difficulties and outcomes of early versus delayed LC following ERCP to determine the most suitable timing for surgery. This cross-sectional study was conducted at Government Rajaji Hospital, Madurai, from April 2024 to April 2025. A total of 80 patients who underwent LC after ERCP in the Department of General Surgery were included. Among them, 45 patients underwent LC within 3 days of ERCP (early group), and 35 patients underwent LC after 3 days (delayed group). Several intraoperative and postoperative factors were assessed and compared, including gallbladder adhesions, frozen Calot’s triangle, drain placement, operative time, conversion to open surgery, and duration of postoperative hospital stay. The majority of patients were aged between 41 and 60 years. The delayed group showed a significantly higher incidence of dense adhesions, frozen Calot’s triangle, requirement for drain placement, longer operative time, higher conversion rates to open surgery, and prolonged hospital stay compared to the early group. Based on these findings, performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 3 days of ERCP is associated with fewer technical challenges, reduced operative time, lower conversion rates, and shorter hospital stays. Delaying surgery beyond this period increases operative difficulty and postoperative morbidity. Therefore, the ideal timing for LC after ERCP is within 72 h to achieve optimal surgical outcomes and minimise complications.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Surgery and Surgical Specialities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Shaffer EA. Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: Has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2005; 7(2):132-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-005-0051-8 PMid:15802102
2. Ko CW, Lee SP. Epidemiology and natural history of common bile duct stones and prediction of disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 56(6 Suppl):S165-S169. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.129005 PMid:12447261
3. Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M. Guidelines on the management of Common Bile Duct Stones (CBDS). Gut. 2008; 57(7):1004-1021. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.121657 PMid:18321943
4. ElGeidie AA. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(10):2546-2550.
5. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP. Br J Surg. 2010; 97(10):14761486. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6870 PMid:20035546
6. Oor JE, Atema JJ, van Dieren S, et al. Systematic review of the optimal timing of cholecystectomy after ERCP. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(12):4721-4730.
7. Boerma D, Rauws EA, Keulemans YC, Ignace, Bolwerk C, Timmer R, et al. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: A randomized trial. Lancet. 2002; 360(9335):761-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(02)09896-3 PMid:12241833
8. Lau JY, Leow CK, Fung TM, et al. Cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones in Chinese patients. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(2):173-1781.
9. Dubois F, Berthelot B, Levard H. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: historic perspective and state of the art. Am J Surg. 1990; 159(3):273-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81214-0 PMid:2137679
10. Peters JH, Ellison EC, Innes JT, et al. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1991; 213(1):312. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199101000-00002 PMid:1824674 PMCid:PMC1358303
11. Oor JE, Atema JJ, van Dieren S, et al. Systematic review of the optimal timing of cholecystectomy after ERCP. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(12):4721-4730.
12. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen JE, Russell R, Meyers WC, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: A prospective study of 3,347 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991; 37(4):383-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2 PMid:2070995
13. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(13):909-918. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199609263351301 PMid:8782497
14. Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M. Guidelines on the management of Common Bile-Duct Stones (CBDS). Gut. 2008; 57(7):1004-1021. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2007.121657 PMid:18321943
15. ElGeidie AA. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for CBD stones: A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2010; 24(10):2546-2550.
16. Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 2004; 188(3):205-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.06.013 PMid:15450821
17. Randhawa JS, Pujahari AK. Preoperative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A scoring method. Indian J Surg. 2009; 71(4):198-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-009-0055-y PMid:23133154 PMCid:PMC3452633
18. Goonawardena J, de Silva WDDP, de Silva H. Predictors of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ceylon Med J. 2015; 60(1):17-20.
19. Boerma D, Erik A.J. Rauws, Yolande C.A. Keulemans, Ignace, Bolwerk C, Timmer R, et al. Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: A randomized trial. Lancet. 2002; 360(9335):761-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09896-3 PMid:12241833
20. Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on early vs delayed LC after ERCP. Br J Surg. 2010; 97(10):1476-1486. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6870 PMid:20035546
21. Lau WY, Lai EC. Classification of iatrogenic bile-duct injury. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2007; 6(5):459-463.
22. Bencini L, Tommasi C, Manetti R, et al. Management of cystic-duct leakage after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009; 23(3):735-740.
23. Huang Y, Cheng Q, Chen X, et al. Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy after ERCP: Systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2022; 24(11):1691-1702.
24. Costi R, Gnocchi A, Di Mario F, Sarli L. Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(37):13382–401.
25. Salman B, Yilmaz U, Kerem M, Bedirli A, Sare M, Sakrak O, et al. The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009; 16(6):832–6.
